![]() | ![]() |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member+ |
If I had a mare, I personally wouldn't breed her until she has proven that she is broodmare quality(ie, temperment, trainablity, etc.)
__________________ It Takes More Muscles to Frown |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member |
I think it is best to not breed a mare until she is at least four or five, preferably six since that gives her not only time to mature fully but also to be trained and proven a bit under saddle.
__________________ No matter what happens, the horse is stronger than you and it is not by force that you work, but with patience and understanding. It's about having an accomplice, not just a tool. -Bartabas |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Senior Member+ |
The youngest I would breed would be at 4 and then they would have it at five. But I would prefer to show her first and get her proven
__________________ Quote:
www.erinssite.weebly.com *I luff Felix and Jackson* | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member | There is certainly nothing wrong with that. I don't think a mare would have any more trouble getting in foal at eight or even ten.
__________________ No matter what happens, the horse is stronger than you and it is not by force that you work, but with patience and understanding. It's about having an accomplice, not just a tool. -Bartabas |
| | |
| Our Sponsors |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I have a quick question abouts roans and roaning??I have another question to add?? | mistysangel0 | Horse Breeding | 10 | 01-21-2008 09:57 AM |
| question about Oster A5 clippers NEW Question | countryacres | Horse Grooming | 7 | 05-15-2007 11:07 AM |
| Canada question, and the next question too now, come back!!!!!! | Chester | Off Topic | 38 | 03-19-2007 07:24 PM |