[Serendipity Zip]

The part that you seem to fail to realize is that carrying on about facts and info is just MODERATLY relevent to the operation of any decent website. That IS about the website and DOES support my post above. It IS relevant and JUST like I said in the above post this is about a website. I didnt think posting poems about slaughter and such was relevent. Dont act as though I have set up a double standard, there isnt one.

The above post I did say my opinion on slaughter, yeah because it had now come down to that. If you are so blind to think it was me that brought it there then you may want to re-read the posts.

And the word is irrelevant.

You don't have get so mean. It was just a question. I wasn't trying to make it seem you "set up a double standard". I find it upseting I can't even ask a question without being accused.

I NEVER said you brought it there, or that anyone else did. I didn't start it either. I just got involved.

[luvs2ride79]

Originally Posted by luvs2ride79

Maybe in Scottland, but that is NOT the case here in the USA. If done properly, of course it's humane. But the people operating this equipment are generally migrant workers that are not well trained (and they don't always speak English). They push through horses at an alarming rate making accuracy very difficult. The chutes are not narrow enough to properly restrain a medium to smaller sized horse, the floor of the chute is slipper with blood, urine, and feces, so it is quite easy to see how this scenario can turn disasterous...

~Barbara

Just because some of you do not agree with this or the FACTS I have given, does NOT mean they are wrong... I did MONTHS of research and fact finding to come up with my site, http://www.hr857.com I actually started out believing slaughter was necessary. I started my research to prove the anti-slaughter propoganda wrong. But, as I dug and dug, I realized that is was not wrong... Some sites/people blow things up, or get small details incorrect, but the facts are the facts.


~Barbara

[*Psylocke*]

Originally Posted by Serendipity Zip

You don't have get so mean. It was just a question. I wasn't trying to make it seem you "set up a double standard". I find it upseting I can't even ask a question without being accused.

I NEVER said you brought it there, or that anyone else did. I didn't start it either. I just got involved.

Look my apologies you took it harsh, I wasnt mean I was blunt. Possibly a bit too much so for you on this so hence my apology. Sincerly, to you SZ.

Psy

[Serendipity Zip]

My apologies as well. Im gonna go ahead and leave this discussion.

[*Psylocke*]

Originally Posted by Serendipity Zip

My apologies as well. Im gonna go ahead and leave this discussion.

I am with you.

Psy