[wyldterv]

Originally Posted by kizmet

yes a know it all tone!!!!

The truth is this has went on for long enough! I really dont care anymore i think we should just get off each others backs put the claws away and get on with helping each other out! after all i have spent the past four days on this thread defending every single post i have written. Im getting alitte tired so my advice lets break for a saucer of milk and a declawing!

Boy I did nto even get my claws out at all for this, ROTFLMAO... That would mean I take it personally which I do not but a nice caramel latte would sure be good about now and so I can break for that, LOL.

[kizmet]

Originally Posted by Blistering Winds

then say you disagree and run. Dont sit here and judge without anything to back up your basis for judging.



which is probably what I should have said in my last post.

Kelly at least was able to say....I'd retire the horse.

That is her answer before ever using that method. Wel, that is something Cindy didn't try.

Don't argue with a person because you don't LIKE the method without bringing up an alternative. Because it solves nothing.





And makes the "disagreement" a total waste of time on both parts.

That is how I see it, and why most of my explanations end up being lecture/book like. Because I have respect to others, when I disagree with something, I say why...what I would do, and has it been tried yet. If it has...I come up with something else. If I can't come up with something else....then I have to make a decision...is it truely CRUEL? Look at it from all sides....

if it is down right cruel. ......like tying a mustang's feet to a rail road tie when the trainer got bucked off one too many times. .....I will state why it is cruel and wash my hands of that person forever.

if it isn't cruel, but something that shouldn't be used in a normal case, I file it away under "EXTREME MEASURES" and move on.

Again just for the record i have no problem with this method i have stated that about six times now!! just want everyone to be able to have there opinion!

[kellidahorsegirl]

Cindy, hence the reason I said nevermind the last post (I couldn't delete it since the mods don't like that).

And BW.....its Kelli with an I

[wyldterv]

Originally Posted by kellidahorsegirl

...And BW.....its Kelli with an I

ROTFLMAO... OMG KELLI (with an I) Your screen name JUST MADE SEENS TO ME.... I always look at it and think What a strange way to try to shorten Kelidascope, and what IS a Kelidascope horse girl anyway????? NOOOOOOOOOO I am NOT even BLONDE!!!!!!!!1 ROTFLMAO...... NOW I get it... KELLI DA HORSE GIRL!!!!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL OK OK back to my bedroom, HEEELP, I don't wanna!!!!!!!! ABUSE, CRUEL UNJUST ABUSE to go back to reorganizing the bedroom!!!!!!!

[kellidahorsegirl]

ummm Karyn.....I think you just won dummy for the day on that one! And the award for making me have the funniest face !!!!!!!!!! HAHAHHAHAHHAA thats just the best. I'm ok with kalidascopehorsegirl though...whatever

[littlecelticpony]

Originally Posted by wyldterv

Yuck then you get dog hair in your mouth, blech...

OK done for now with my 'break' time to go back to room reorganization ,sigh... I have an opionion on that too, and it's not a nice one

Their ears aren't that hairy, hahaha.
But you're talking to the girl who doesn't use many words to get the dogs to go lie down, just a hard stare and a lifted lip!

Does that make me some sort of Natural Dog-Man-Ship / cruelty hybrid? lololool.

[Blistering Winds]

Originally Posted by kellidahorsegirl

Cindy, hence the reason I said nevermind the last post (I couldn't delete it since the mods don't like that).

And BW.....its Kelli with an I

oops....shoot, be lucky I knew that much about your name.



but I'll remember that now.



Wyld...how on EARTH did you get kalidascope out of her name???

Must be the altitude....

[kizmet]

I have to admit i thought it was kilidascope

[Jenje!]

Or all those dog face noogies.

[Super Step]

Originally Posted by kizmet

Again just for the record i have no problem with this method i have stated that about six times now!! just want everyone to be able to have there opinion!

Everyone can have their opinion.
I believe the problem comes when someone voices an opposing opinion with out a alternative solution.
I can have an opinion that I do not think saddles should be used on horses. I have every right to have that opinion. But if I chose to speak that opinion and not provide a working alternative, then I lose credibility.
People can ask, 'How do we compete in jumping, roping or any event with out a saddle'? If my reply is, 'I believe you should work to find an alternative, because you will never convince me a saddle is not bad', then all I have offered is a worthless opinion.
When I post my opinion for the word to see, I also need to be able to defend my opinion.