[Debbie z.]

You basically re worded my post into a question that was already stated.

[JBandRio]

Huh?

DB, obviously I'm not following it as well as you thought! LOL

[accphotography]

I'm totally lost and have been for several posts... sigh.

ACC

[Debbie z.]

There is sabino white genes that come from two parents that masks color.
The white foal will still be chesnut only he'll have the white gene masking the color.
With true roans there's always an underlying color.
Don't sigh ACC, just give an opinon like always.

[doublebarr]

Originally Posted by Debbie z.

There is sabino white genes that come from two parents that masks color.
The white foal will still be chesnut only he'll have the white gene masking the color.
With true roans there's always an underlying color.
Don't sigh ACC, just give an opinon like always.

Debbie z,

I've never gotten into it with you, so hopefully you wont think that this is a "continuing attack", but really, your post don't make a whole lot of sense. I get so confused trying to figure out what you are saying and what it pertains to. I'm sorry, but that is what everyone else is having trouble with too. The sigh is because we CANNOT make heads or tails of them.

[accphotography]

Originally Posted by Debbie z.

There is sabino white genes that come from two parents that masks color.
The white foal will still be chesnut only he'll have the white gene masking the color.
With true roans there's always an underlying color.
Don't sigh ACC, just give an opinon like always.

I can not offer an opinion when I have no idea what we are supposed to be talking about.

You say with true roans there's always an underlying color... with every color there is always an underlying color (with sole exception of simple chestnut and true black).

ACC

[RiddleMeThis]

Originally Posted by doublebarr

Debbie z,

I've never gotten into it with you, so hopefully you wont think that this is a "continuing attack", but really, your post don't make a whole lot of sense. I get so confused trying to figure out what you are saying and what it pertains to. I'm sorry, but that is what everyone else is having trouble with too. The sigh is because we CANNOT make heads or tails of them.

This may be a first....but I agree....

[JBandRio]

Originally Posted by Debbie z.

There is sabino white genes that come from two parents that masks color.
The white foal will still be chesnut only he'll have the white gene masking the color.
With true roans there's always an underlying color.

With any "white" horse, whether that is max sabino or gray, there is always and underlying color. What does roan, true or otherwise, have to do with it?

[Debbie z.]

Originally Posted by acc photography

I can not offer an opinion when I have no idea what we are supposed to be talking about.

You say with true roans there's always an underlying color... with every color there is always an underlying color (with sole exception of simple chestnut and true black).

ACC

You should have stated that in beginning.

[Debbie z.]

Originally Posted by RiddleMeThis

I think she is saying waht she calls sorrel vs chestnut are different genetically and IMO TECHNICALLY they are.

As of right now we only know they are ee, but there has to be some gene that is determining color, and that gene will be different from a liver to a pale chestnut IMO. So imo that is how they are "different genetically."

Now for my thoughts, for ME EVERYTHING is chestnut. Its just shades that are different. Sorrel vs chestnut whether genetically or phenotypically IMO really is just a different name for the same thing.

This made sense to RMT and everyone interperets things differently.