![]() | ![]() |
| ||||||||
| Register | Clubs | Blogs | FAQ | Members | Chat | Horse Pictures | Map | Top Threads | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Outdoor Lighting |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member |
I was talking to a friend of mine today, and she said that as of 2010 AQHA will no longer register Impressive bred horses. Any horse that has ANY Impressive breeding on either side will no longer be able to be registered. Has anyone else heard this? |
| | |
| Our Sponsors |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member |
i thought that had already took effect???? i thought in 2005. i could be wrong tho.
__________________ What ifs are good things to think about, but bad things to live by. member of the 20lb club proud member of the FF Club |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Senior Member+ | Quote:
I wouldn't think that is right. Probably if any horse tests positive for HYPP then they won't be registered.
__________________ Dream if you wish.... Dreams are a nice diversion from reality and sometimes they are all that gets you through. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member+ |
As of Jan 1 2007 if a horse tests H/H for HYPP then they can't be registered. Without looking at anything, it seems that the 2010 rule will allow a horse to be registered if they are N/H but only if they are gelded/spayhed.
__________________ Dream if you wish.... Dreams are a nice diversion from reality and sometimes they are all that gets you through. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member+ |
It is any Impressive horse that is HH. NH and of course NN horses are still registerable. NNs will always be registerable. If I remember right, they're saying no NH after 2017.
__________________ Acme Acres Home of Dun Overo APHA/PtHA Stallion: Reflections Playboy & ShowHorseSupplies.com www.azpainthorses.com |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member |
just did some reading here is what i found: 1. Rule 227 will be amended making foals of calendar year 2006 and after ineligible for registration if they are descendants of the stallion Impressive, AQHA Number 0767246, and found to be HYPP positive (H/H). 2. Additionally, Rule 227 will be amended to provide that foals of 2010 and later that are found to be HYPP (N/H) will only be eligible for registration as geldings or non-breeding mares. i guess ill be passing this on to my friend your right lexy |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member+ |
I know this discussion is a few weeks old, but I thought this would be a good place to make a correction so if anyone finds it for reference, they will have the correct info. CORRECTION I talked to the owner of the stallion we are breeding our mares to today. We were talking about HYPP and HERDA. The mare I had there is N/H and I made the comment I didn't know what we were going to do with her come 2010. While she would retain her papers and would be allowed to bred, any foal she had that tested N/H would be subject to the geld/spay rule to obtain registration. Gelding isn't a problem, but spaying a mare is a different ball game. From what I understand, spaying is a large animal hospital, major surgery, bookoos of money type deal and I am not interested in not having an unregistered horse nor do I want to have to put out that kind of money just to get papers. She told me I didn't need to worry that the whole deal with the N/H horses had been defeated. That the 2010 rule would NOT be implemented. Just wanted to clear up my above info.
__________________ Dream if you wish.... Dreams are a nice diversion from reality and sometimes they are all that gets you through. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member+ |
Are you saying that she is saying the 2010 rule has been vetoed? Where did she hear/read that? Spaying these days doesn't have to be the big deal that it was. It no longer has to be a huge, lay 'em out on the table ordeal. It's still not trivial, but it's not nearly as complicated as it used to be.
__________________ - JB Acres, owned and operated by Dynamite animals. - It's a wonder horses as a whole don't just kill us all and be done with their misery. - Keep your voice soothing and low - even when things get western (buck1173) - You can't hit me with all those snowballs! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member+ |
It also did NOT SAY ANYTHING about spaying, only "non-breeding", meaning NONE of the mare's foals could be registered by AQHA. I would also NOT go off the word of some friend as to what a registry is doing. Go look it up on their web site or call to verify.
__________________ "To be an equestrian in the classical sense is not just to be a rider. It is a position in life." --Charles de Kunffy EquineFriends.com**2HotToTrot.com |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Member+ |
Gee.... You are right it says NON breeding mare. I was gonna fix it this morning. Nothing has been implemented except the 2007 H/H out rule. You will see the first proposal is about the 2010 deal. The second is to have any positive horse be ineligible for registration beginning 2024. I can't find anything else concerning the status of the N/H horses and registration. Quote:
__________________ Dream if you wish.... Dreams are a nice diversion from reality and sometimes they are all that gets you through. | |
| | |
| Our Sponsors |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Impressive Breeding? | WhiskeyPaints | Horse Breeding | 60 | 01-17-2007 07:30 AM |
| How to order a pizza in the year 2010 | pocahontas | Off Topic | 16 | 10-01-2006 02:36 AM |
| Impressive QH Breeding. | Mirumel | Horse Chat | 23 | 09-13-2006 04:16 PM |
| Men's Hockey Training for 2010 | cowgurly02 | Off Topic | 6 | 03-04-2006 04:07 PM |
| whats wrong with Impressive breeding?? | Love2TrailRide | Horse Breeding | 76 | 03-04-2005 04:34 PM |